Political Updates
|
NARAL P.O. Box 279 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sponsored by Rep. Penny Morgan (R-Billings)
This bill would have required that women be given the choice to anesthetize the fetus. Women are already given anesthesia before an abortion is performed. HB 460 would have forced doctors to offer women an experimental medical procedure not currently practiced in any state. Doctors refusing to offer this experimental procedures would have faced felony charges. This bill passed on Second Reading on a close vote. After an intensive voter mobilization effort organized by NARAL and its allies, this bill was defeated on Third Reading (46-52).
Click below to see how your Montana legislators voted. (A yes vote is anti-choice.)
Why NARAL Pro-Choice Montana was against HB 460: HB 460 is part of a broader anti-choice strategy to use fear and coercion to prevent women from having abortions. It required experimental procedures and threatened doctors with criminal charges for acting in their patients’ best interest. This bill targets reproductive health clinics by creating medically unnecessary regulations and unconstitutional restrictions.
Talking Points:
Doctors and health care providers already have a duty to ensure that women receive accurate information and appropriate care. Failure to do so violates standards of care.
There is no other known statutory scheme for any other medical procedure that is this burdensome.
website design by bigskyweb.com
